Hyderabad · de-blueoak-mangatram-llp
Rise With 9
A Hyderabad reference for buyers reading newer launches through liveability, ticket-size discipline, and how much confidence they need before shortlisting.
One by MSN is an ultra-luxury 4 BHK development on Plot No. 1 of the HMDA Neopolis layout at Kokapet, Hyderabad, built by MSN Urban Ventures LLP under the MSN Realty brand. The signed environmental clearance of 11 February 2025 files 660 residences in five towers on 7.717 acres, with three towers at 57 upper floors plus a helipad and two at 56, over four to five basement levels. Homes run 5,250 to 7,460 sq ft saleable, and nothing smaller than a 4 BHK exists anywhere on the plot. Portals also list the project as MSN One. MSN Realty publishes no price, so this site publishes none either.
There is a second thing worth saying in the first screen, because it is the reason this page exists. The developer's own marketing says 655 residences and 55 floors. The signed government order says 660 residences and up to 57 upper floors. Developer marketing usually inflates. Here it understates the building by two floors and undercounts the homes by five, and that order has been sitting in the public record since 11 February 2025. We publish the filing, disclose the marketed figure beside it, average neither, and do not speculate about why the two differ. Everything else on this site is written the same way. Prestige Golden Grove keeps the wider Hyderabad context in view, especially when buyers are weighing format, commute patience, and how much certainty they need before shortlisting.
| Detail | Value |
|---|---|
| Project name | One by MSN |
| Also listed as | MSN One, MSN One Neopolis, One by MSN Kokapet, Onebymsn |
| Developer brand | MSN Realty, the real-estate division of the MSN Group, established 2021 |
| Promoter entity of record | MSN Urban Ventures LLP, incorporated 16 September 2021, RoC Hyderabad |
| Name on the filing | High-rise Residential Apartments by M/s. MSN Urban Ventures LLP |
| Address as filed | Plot No. 1, Survey Nos. 239 and 240, Neopolis Layout, Kokapet, Gandipet Mandal, Rangareddy District, Telangana 500075 |
| Coordinates as filed | 17.404925 N, 78.304675 E |
| Site area | 31,229.59 sq m, being 7.717 acres. Marketed as 7.7 acres |
| Residences | 660 as filed. The developer markets 655 |
| Towers | Five residential towers named AON, UNO, EKA, ODIN and ISA, plus a separate clubhouse block |
| Floors as filed | Three towers at 57 upper floors with a helipad, two at 56 with a helipad, over four to five basements and a ground floor. The clubhouse block is five basements, ground and four upper floors |
| Floors as marketed | 55, which understates the filing |
| Configuration | 4 BHK only, in two variants - 4 BHK + M, and 4 BHK + M + HO |
| Saleable sizes | 5,250, 5,510, 6,465 and 7,460 sq ft |
| Ceiling height | 12 ft ceiling to ceiling, the developer's specification |
| Total built-up area | 5,08,494.17 sq m, roughly 54.7 lakh sq ft on our own conversion |
| Amenity area | 1,80,000 sq ft of clubhouse, Sky Park and amenities, the developer's figure |
| Parking | 2,904 four-wheeler and 250 two-wheeler bays, as filed |
| Greenbelt | 3,185.42 sq m, 10.20 per cent of the site, as filed |
| Project cost | ₹1,000 crore in the environmental clearance. The April 2025 launch release announced a ₹2,750 crore planned investment, which is a different measure |
| Environmental Clearance | Granted by the state environmental authority on 11 February 2025, Category B1, Schedule 8(b) |
| TG-RERA | P02400009393, published by the developer in its own website footer. Registry-unconfirmed. See the compliance section below |
| HMDA building permission | 011159/BP/HMDA/2925/SKP/2024, published by the developer, not independently verified |
| Planning authority | HMDA, which developed and auctioned the Neopolis layout |
| Civic body | Cyberabad Municipal Corporation, Serilingampally Zone, Narsingi Circle, Ward 125 |
| Main contractor | Shapoorji Pallonji Group, reported by Sakshi Post on 28 April 2026 and not stated in any filing |
| Price | Not published by the developer |
| Possession | Not established. No completion date appears in the environmental clearance |
| Status | Under construction |
Fifteen live broker properties, a dozen portals and the developer's own website publish the same two numbers: 55 floors and 655 residences. The signed government order of 11 February 2025 files 660 residences, and it files the towers individually — T1, T3 and T5 at four or five basements plus ground, a service floor, 57 upper floors and a helipad; T2 and T4 at four or five basements plus ground, 56 upper floors and a helipad — with the clubhouse block at five basements, ground and four upper floors. "Up to 57 upper floors" is the accurate short phrasing.
The order also carries a great deal that appears nowhere else in public: a total built-up area of 5,08,494.17 sq m, 2,904 four-wheeler and 250 two-wheeler parking bays, a greenbelt of 3,185.42 sq m at 10.20 per cent of the site, an on-site 910 KLD sewage treatment plant against a water requirement of 872 KLD, diesel backup of 3 x 1,500 kVA plus 1 x 750 kVA, a project cost of ₹1,000 crore, and an environmental budget of ₹618 lakh capital with ₹149.5 lakh a year recurring. It also records, explicitly, that Kokapet is not among the 84 catchment villages listed in GO Ms No. 111 of 8 March 1996 — so the building prohibition that has stalled schemes elsewhere in this district does not bite on this plot.
One caution that follows from reading the order rather than the brochure. The clearance does not say which of AON, UNO, EKA, ODIN and ISA is T1, T2, T3, T4 or T5. Any page telling you that a named tower rises to a particular height is filling in a mapping that no document makes. We keep the two vocabularies apart on every page of this site.
One by MSN is 4 BHK only, in two variants: 4 BHK + M, and 4 BHK + M + HO. There is no 3 BHK, no 3.5 BHK and no compact tier hidden in the lower floors. The smallest residence on the entire 7.717 acres is 5,250 sq ft saleable.
At 660 homes that is unusual at this scale. Most large Neopolis schemes dilute — a smaller configuration goes into the same towers to widen the buyer pool, and the 4 BHK ends up sharing lifts, lobbies and the clubhouse with homes half its size. Here the whole programme is one product.
What that is not, is low density, and we will not tell you it is. Six hundred and sixty homes on 7.717 acres is about 85.5 homes per acre on our own arithmetic, which is denser than several named neighbours. The distinction that actually holds up is uniformity, not sparseness: nothing smaller exists anywhere on the plot, at a scale no other single-configuration project in Kokapet attempts. If sparseness is what you are buying, this is the wrong project, and the density number above is the one to check first.
One by MSN is the MSN Group's first real-estate project. Its own sales deck says so. That means no completed projects, no delivered square feet and no families served, and a buyer paying seven figures in advance should weigh that plainly.
It also means the opposite of the usual risk register. TG-RERA's Orders, Orders of Authority, Proceedings, Public Notices, Revoked and Defaulters lists return zero occurrences of "MSN", read on 31 August 2026 — no complaints, no adverse orders, no delivery delays, because there has been nothing to complain about yet. Behind the realty arm sits MSN Group, a pharmaceutical business built around MSN Laboratories, MSN Lifesciences and MSN Pharmachem, founded and chaired by Dr. MSN Reddy, that crossed US$1 billion in revenue in FY2023-24. The land under this project was won at an HMDA e-auction on 16 July 2021 for ₹325.83 crore, at ₹42.2 crore an acre, bid by MSN Laboratories Pvt Ltd.
Both halves belong in the same paragraph. Capital is not a delivery record, and a clean record that exists because nothing has been delivered is not the same as a proven one.
Osman Sagar's nearest mapped shoreline sits 885 m south of the plot, and the nearest carriageway of the Outer Ring Road sits 839 m north. Both are measured proximities, not drive times, and both are independently checkable on the survey record. The view over the lake is the developer's claim, phrased in its deck as "25,000 acres of uninterrupted views", and it is quoted here as the developer's claim rather than restated as fact.
The developer places its Sky Park at 2,597 ft above mean sea level, and separately describes it as 200 m above ground on its own website. Ground here is roughly 562 m above mean sea level, so 2,597 ft works out to about 230 m above ground on our arithmetic. The two developer figures are 30 m apart, which is within the error of the elevation dataset plus excavation. What matters is that 2,597 ft is above sea level, not above the ground — a distinction several pages about this project get wrong.
The filed address is Plot No. 1, Survey Numbers 239 and 240, Neopolis Layout, Kokapet, Gandipet Mandal, Rangareddy District, Telangana 500075. Portals that file this project under Narsingi or Khanapur are wrong; the filed revenue village is Kokapet and the filed mandal is Gandipet. OpenStreetMap carries a surveyed construction footprint named "MSN Realty" whose centroid sits 139 m from the filed coordinate.
Every figure below is road-routed on OpenStreetMap data with two independent engines and calibrated to Hyderabad's own measured congestion. None of it is straight-line and none of it comes from the deck's minutes column.
| Destination | By road | Typical drive |
|---|---|---|
| Neopolis trumpet interchange on the ORR | about 1.3 to 1.6 km | 3 to 5 min |
| Financial District core | 5.55 km | 13 min |
| Continental Hospitals, Gachibowli and Nanakramguda | 5.96 km | 13 min |
| Wipro Circle, Gachibowli | 6.63 km | 14 min |
| The Gaudium School, Nanakramguda and Khajaguda | about 8 to 10 km | 16 min |
| Gachibowli junction and stadium belt | 8.27 km | 18 min |
| Apollo Hospitals, Financial District | 8.42 km | 17 min |
| Oakridge International School, Gachibowli and Khajaguda | 10.39 km | 18 min |
| Raidurg metro station, the nearest operating station | 13.41 km | 21 min |
| Sarath City Capital Mall, Kondapur | 13.72 km | 21 min |
| HITEC City and Cyber Towers | 15.57 km | 26 min |
| Rajiv Gandhi International Airport, Terminal 1 | 32.43 km | 35 to 45 min |
Two things a buyer should hear before a site visit. There is no metro station at Neopolis today. Hyderabad Metro Phase 2 Corridor V runs Raidurg to Kokapet Neopolis, 11.6 km with 8 stations, and HMRL's own general-consultant tender of 12 August 2026 names that terminus. But the corridor has the Centre's in-principle approval for 50:50 funding only, no financial sanction, no civil-works award and no published station locations. Any page quoting two minutes to a Neopolis metro station is quoting a station that has not been sited.
And the World Trade Center, mall and hotel about a kilometre away are Brigade's, not MSN's. Brigade Enterprises' World Trade Center, Orion Mall and InterContinental hotel are under construction on a 9.7-acre plot inside the same Neopolis layout, with a target possession of November 2029. They are real and they are close. They are also a competitor's assets, and the deck's unattributed "02 MIN" row does not tell you that.
Distances are road distances returned by the OSRM demo routing server on a car profile at free-flow speed, cross-checked against Valhalla. Both read the same OpenStreetMap base, so their agreement is a check on the chosen path, not an independent survey. Where the two disagreed by more than about ten percent, this page publishes a range rather than a single figure.
Free-flow minutes are then calibrated against the TomTom Traffic Index 2025 for Hyderabad, which records an average congestion level of 55.5 percent and an evening-rush level of 85.7 percent. TomTom defines congestion level as the percentage of extra travel time over free-flow, so it is applied directly: typical is free-flow multiplied by 1.555, peak by 1.857. The "typical minutes" column below is the one to plan around.
Three caveats belong with the numbers.
Hyderabad Metro Phase 2 Corridor V, running Raidurg to Kokapet Neopolis over 11.6 km with 8 stations, terminates in this layout. That is not marketing. HMRL's own Request for Proposal for the appointment of a General Consultant for Phase II, issued on 12 August 2026 with bids due 17 September 2026, names the corridor in exactly those terms, and describes it as a wholly elevated extension of the Blue Line running via Biodiversity Junction, Khajaguda Road, Nanakramguda Junction, Wipro Circle and the Financial District.
What the corridor does not have, as of September 2026, is the part that matters. It has the Centre's in-principle approval for 50:50 funding and no full financial sanction. It has a live general-consultant tender, which is a pre-construction design appointment and not a civil-works award. Construction has not started. And no station siting has been published: with 8 stations spread over 11.6 km, the terminus could sit anywhere across the Neopolis layout.
This page therefore publishes no distance and no minute figure to a Neopolis metro station. The deck's "Proposed Metro Station, 02 MIN" cannot be verified, because there is no station to measure to. Any page quoting a two-minute walk is quoting a station that has not been sited.
The number a buyer actually needs is the nearest station that runs trains today.
| Station | Road km | Typical min | Peak min | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raidurg, Blue Line terminus | 13.41 | 21 | 25 | Operating. The nearest working metro station |
| HITEC City | 14.98 | 24 | 29 | Operating |
| Madhapur | 16.70 | 30 | 35 | Operating |
One more clarification, because it circulates: the airport metro, Corridor IV from Nagole to RGIA, runs on the far side of the city and has nothing to do with airport access from this address.
One by MSN occupies 31,229.59 sq m, being 7.717 acres, on Plot No. 1 of the HMDA Neopolis layout at Kokapet. On it stand five residential towers and a separate clubhouse block, over a total built-up area of 5,08,494.17 sq m, and under them four to five basement levels holding the parking. Those figures come from the signed Environmental Clearance issued by the state environmental authority on 11 February 2025.
Every land-use number on this page is a filed number. Where the clearance does not give a figure, this page says so rather than estimating one, and where the arithmetic on this page is our own it is labelled as ours. That applies to the whole site, and on a masterplan page — where brochure diagrams are usually the only source anybody has — it matters more than most. Searches for the MSN One master plan land on a good deal of material that is drawn rather than filed.
| Item | Filed value |
|---|---|
| Site area | 31,229.59 sq m, being 7.717 acres. Marketed as 7.7 acres |
| Total built-up area | 5,08,494.17 sq m, roughly 54.7 lakh sq ft on our own conversion |
| Residential towers | 5, named AON, UNO, EKA, ODIN and ISA by the developer |
| Clubhouse block | 1, separate from the towers, filed at five basements, ground and four upper floors |
| Residences | 660 as filed. The developer markets 655 |
| Basement levels | Four under two towers, five under the other three and under the clubhouse block |
| Parking area | 1,27,531.33 sq m, roughly 13.7 lakh sq ft on our own conversion |
| Car parking bays | 2,904 |
| Two-wheeler bays | 250 |
| Greenbelt | 3,185.42 sq m, being 10.20 per cent of the site, and roughly 34,300 sq ft on our own conversion |
| Amenity area | 1,80,000 sq ft of clubhouse, Sky Park and amenities. This is the developer's own figure, not a filed one |
| Project cost | ₹1,000 crore, as filed |
One caution about the built-up figure, because it is the one most often misread. 5,08,494.17 sq m is a gross number. It includes the basements, the parking decks, plant rooms, lift cores, lobbies, corridors and every other common area, and it is not a total of saleable apartment area. Dividing 54.7 lakh sq ft by 660 homes does not give you an apartment size, and any page that does that arithmetic has produced a figure that means nothing. The saleable sizes are 5,250, 5,510, 6,465 and 7,460 sq ft, and they are set out on the floor plans page.
No ground-coverage percentage, setback dimension or internal road width for this plot appears in the material behind this page, so none is printed here. The greenbelt and the parking area are the two land-use figures the clearance gives, and they are the two this page publishes.
The clearance files each building individually. This is the configuration as filed.
| Building as filed | Filed configuration |
|---|---|
| T1 | 4 basements, ground, a service floor, 57 upper floors and a helipad |
| T2 | 4 basements, ground, 56 upper floors and a helipad |
| T3 | 5 basements, ground, a service floor, 57 upper floors and a helipad |
| T4 | 5 basements, ground, 56 upper floors and a helipad |
| T5 | 5 basements, ground, a service floor, 57 upper floors and a helipad |
| Clubhouse block | 5 basements, ground and 4 upper floors |
Three towers at 57 upper floors and two at 56, each with a helipad, over four to five basement levels and a ground floor. "Up to 57 upper floors" is the accurate short phrasing. The developer's marketing says 55 floors, which understates the building by two, and the Airports Authority of India issued five height NOCs on 26 October 2023, after an earlier clearance on 5 October 2023 — five NOCs for five towers.
The developer names its towers AON, UNO, EKA, ODIN and ISA. The clearance files them as T1 to T5.
⚠️ No document maps one set onto the other. The clearance never says which tower is AON and which is T3, and neither the deck nor the developer's website closes the gap.
The consequence is specific and worth stating. Any statement that a named tower rises to 57 floors, or sits over five basements rather than four, is filling in a link nobody has published. Two of the five towers are filed one floor shorter than the other three, and two sit over four basements rather than five. Which named tower is which is not established.
So this page uses the tower names when it describes what the developer attaches to a name — amenity suites and unit sizes, both of which come from the deck's own pages — and T1 to T5 when it describes filed floor and basement counts. The two vocabularies never meet in one sentence anywhere on this site.
| Tower name | What the developer's deck attaches to it |
|---|---|
| AON | 7,460 sq ft residences. Football simulator, convenience store, ATM, dart room, pool table |
| UNO | 7,460 sq ft residences. Banquet hall with kitchen, library, story nook, pharmacy, co-working space and working pods, multipurpose room, clinic with an emergency room |
| EKA | 5,250 and 5,510 sq ft residences. Two squash courts, art gallery, cricket simulator, golf simulator, waiting lounge, viewing gallery and lounge, indoor play zone |
| ODIN | 5,250 and 5,510 sq ft residences. Mini-theatre, VR room, bowling, dance floor with lighting, creche, kids' learning centre |
| ISA | 6,465 sq ft residences. Senior citizen lounge, aqua gym, temperature-controlled pool, lounge and lobby, pool and deck area with jacuzzi, coffee lounge, chess zone, pool table |
The clubhouse block is a separate building, and there is one of it. The clearance files a single clubhouse at five basements, ground and four upper floors, and the deck describes one yacht-shaped clubhouse. A developer blog post of July 2026 describes "7 Grand Clubhouses"; that is relabelling the five tower amenity suites and the Sky Park as clubhouses, and this site does not carry the number. The amenities page sets out what is in each.
The clearance files a greenbelt of 3,185.42 sq m, being 10.20 per cent of the 31,229.59 sq m site — roughly 34,300 sq ft on our own conversion.
Two things about that number. First, it is the clearance's own greenbelt category and it is not a claim about total open space. Greenbelt in an environmental clearance is a defined planted area, and a plot can have podium landscape, courts, decks and hardscaped open ground that sit outside it. No open-space percentage for this project appears in any source behind this page, so this page does not publish one, and a buyer should be sceptical of any page that does without saying where it came from.
Second, 10.20 per cent is the filed figure and this site is not going to dress it up. On 7.717 acres with 660 homes and 2,904 car bays, the ground plane is working hard. The green that a resident actually experiences here is likely to be podium and terrace landscape rather than open ground, and the amenity programme is stacked vertically rather than spread out — five tower amenity suites and a Sky Park at the top rather than a large open central park. That is a design choice, not a defect, but it is a different product from a low-rise scheme with a large ground-level garden, and it should be seen for what it is on a site visit rather than in a render.
Four saleable sizes, taken from the developer's own dated area statement. Every one is a 4 BHK.
| Tower or towers | Saleable area | Facings in the area statement | Configuration |
|---|---|---|---|
| AON and UNO | 7,460 sq ft | East and West | 4 BHK + M + HO |
| ISA | 6,465 sq ft | East and West | 4 BHK + M + HO |
| EKA and ODIN | 5,510 sq ft | North | 4 BHK + M |
| EKA and ODIN | 5,250 sq ft | East and West | 4 BHK + M |
The published range is 5,250 to 7,460 sq ft, and there are four distinct sizes inside it, not two. The deck's own cover prints the range as 5,250 to 7,460; the 5,510 and 6,465 plans sit inside it and are easy to miss if you only read a cover.
Two of the developer's own sources disagree about the size of the Tower ISA residence, and this page publishes 6,465 sq ft.
The area statement in the sales deck says 6,465 sq ft. The enquiry form on the developer's own website offers a size list of 5,250, 5,510, 6,345 and 7,460, putting the ISA plan 120 sq ft lower at 6,345.
We publish 6,465 for a reason that can be checked in one line. The deck's figure reconciles exactly to its own components: carpet 3,734 plus balcony 654 plus common 2,077 comes to 6,465 on the east plan, and 3,714 plus 666 plus 2,085 comes to 6,465 on the west. The website's 6,345 reconciles to nothing published anywhere. It appears in a form dropdown with no area breakdown behind it.
Both are the developer's own sources, so this is not a case of marketing against a filing. It is a case of a document that shows its working against a dropdown that does not. If you are buying in Tower ISA, get the saleable, carpet, balcony and common figures for your specific unit in writing on the allotment letter, and check that they add up. A 120 sq ft difference at this ticket size is not a rounding error.
Every image on this page is an artistic impression. No tower at One by MSN is finished - the project is under construction, and on the single on-ground report available, published by Sakshi Post on 28 April 2026, excavation was complete for all five basements with multiple towers at second-floor level and a third in progress. There is therefore no photograph of a completed building to publish, and any page presenting one is not showing you this project.
Treat what follows as an illustration of intent. The documents that govern what actually gets built are the sanctioned HMDA drawings and the agreement of sale, and no render is a substitute for either. Each caption below says what the image shows, what a buyer can take from it, and where the image runs ahead of the record.
A render is a design intent, produced before the building exists, and it is the weakest form of evidence in the whole document set. It cannot tell you the finished clear ceiling height, the actual view from your floor, which named tower carries which filed floor count, what the amenities will cost to run, or when any of it will be handed over - no completion date appears in the environmental clearance and none has been established elsewhere.
The things that can be checked, can be checked on paper today: the signed environmental clearance, the sanctioned HMDA drawings, the TG-RERA record, and the written agreement of sale. Ask for those four, and use the images for what they are worth, which is a sense of the ambition rather than a record of the result.
The developer puts the amenity programme at 1,80,000 sq ft of clubhouse, Sky Park and amenities. That is the deck's own figure and this page carries it as the developer's specification rather than as a filed number, because it is not one. What the signed environmental clearance of 11 February 2025 files is narrower and more specific: one clubhouse block of five basements, a ground floor and four upper floors, alongside the five residential towers.
Both of those statements are true at the same time, and the difference between them is the whole reason this page is organised the way it is. The clearance files buildings. The deck describes what goes inside them. Neither one is a lie about the other, but a page that blurs them will eventually publish something that no document supports - and on this project one such number is already circulating.
A post on the developer's own blog dated 16 July 2026 describes "7 Grand Clubhouses". This site does not carry that count.
The environmental clearance files a single clubhouse block, and the sales deck describes one clubhouse, which its own copy calls a yacht clubhouse. What the blog appears to be doing is relabelling the five towers' individual amenity floors, plus the Sky Park, as clubhouses in their own right. That is a marketing choice rather than a factual claim, and it is not the kind of number a buyer should carry into a negotiation, because the sanctioned drawing behind it shows one clubhouse block.
The honest description is the one this page uses throughout: one clubhouse block, five tower amenity suites, and one Sky Park. That is a large and genuinely unusual programme. It does not need inflating.
| Element | What it is | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Clubhouse block | Five basements, ground floor and four upper floors, as a separate building alongside the five towers | Environmental clearance, filed |
| Tower amenity suites | An allocated amenity set inside each of AON, UNO, EKA, ODIN and ISA | Sales deck, the developer's own |
| Sky Park | A sky-level amenity deck, placed by the developer at 2,597 ft above mean sea level | Sales deck, the developer's own |
| Total amenity area | 1,80,000 sq ft covering clubhouse, Sky Park and amenities together | Sales deck, the developer's own |
One arithmetic warning, because it is an easy mistake to make in the other direction. The developer's website separately advertises "over 70,000 sq ft of stilt amenities". That figure is a subset of the 1,80,000 sq ft, not an addition to it. The deck does not break the stilt component out, and adding the two produces a number the developer has never claimed.
The list below is the deck's, in the deck's own terms. It is the developer's specification of intent for a building that is not yet finished.
Fitness and wellness. Indoor gym, yoga, Pilates studio, aerobics, Zumba, TRX training, boxing, jacuzzi, spa, salon and sauna.
Sport. Badminton courts.
Social and hospitality. Banquet hall with kitchen, party hall, terrace party zone, pantry and store, guest rooms, reception lounge, luxury waiting lounges, the Ace Lounge, the Queen's Lounge, a sports lounge and a viewing gallery.
The deck describes the building itself as yacht-shaped, and lists concierge services, private tower lobbies and dual entry and exit gates among the project's service differentiators.
The Sky Park is the piece of this programme that has no equivalent at ground level, and it is also the piece most often described wrongly.
The deck places it at 2,597 ft above mean sea level. The developer's own website separately describes it as 200 m above ground level. Those are two different qualifiers rather than two competing claims, and mixing them is how a fabrication gets published. Ground level at the filed coordinate is roughly 562 m above mean sea level, so 2,597 ft, which is 791.6 m above sea level, works out to roughly 230 m above ground on our own arithmetic. That derived figure and the developer's stated 200 m are 30 m apart, which sits inside the vertical error of the elevation dataset plus excavation, and neither number should be averaged into the other.
What matters is that 2,597 ft is a height above sea level and not a height above the ground. Several pages about this project mix the two qualifiers, and the numbers that let you tell them apart sit a paragraph apart in the developer's own material.
What the deck says is up there: a sky infinity pool, sky gym, sky yoga, a sky party lounge, a sky cinema, a sky library, a sky walk, a sky garden and a sky stargazing deck.
No developer price exists, and no page should invent one. The rates in circulation come from portals and broker listings, and they disagree with one another by more than 75 per cent, which is itself the finding: none of them is a price list.
What can be published honestly is the mechanism and the market. Independent evidence for new-launch Neopolis inventory in 2026 — including Godrej Properties' own guidance on the neighbouring Plot 16 and Brigade Enterprises' disclosed sales realisation — points to an effective rate of roughly ₹13,300 to ₹16,100 per sq ft, which would place a 5,250 to 7,460 sq ft residence in a ₹7 crore to ₹12 crore band before charges. That is a market estimate, not MSN's rate. On top of whatever the contract price turns out to be, Telangana adds a flat 12.5 per cent in statutory charges: 5 per cent GST with no input tax credit, 5.5 per cent stamp duty, 1.5 per cent transfer duty and 0.5 per cent registration fee. The developer's own charge schedule — clubhouse, corpus, advance maintenance, parking, floor rise — is not published for this project, so ask for it in writing. The price page works all of this through with a labelled illustrative example.
This part is knowable today, because it is the state's own published rate rather than anybody's marketing. It comes from the Telangana Registration and Stamps Department ready reckoner, read on 31 August 2026. Kokapet now sits inside a municipal corporation, so the sale-deed row for other areas applies.
| Layer | Rate | Charged on |
|---|---|---|
| GST, under-construction non-affordable residential | 5 percent, with no input tax credit | the consideration for the construction service |
| Stamp duty | 5.5 percent | market value or consideration, whichever is higher |
| Transfer duty | 1.5 percent | same |
| Registration fee | 0.5 percent | same |
| Statutory total | 12.5 percent, flat | - |
| Mutation, municipal corporation | 0.1 percent of registration value, or ₹3,000, whichever is higher, under G.O.Ms.No.183 | registration value |
| Electricity connection name change | ₹25 plus 18 percent GST | - |
| Water Board name change | Nil | - |
| TDS under section 194-IA | 1 percent, withheld from the seller on consideration of ₹50 lakh and above. This is not an additional cost to you | consideration |
Preferential location charges are bundled into the 5 percent GST, not taxed separately, under CBIC Circular 177/09/2022-TRU of 3 August 2022. If a cost sheet hands you a separate 18 percent GST line on a floor-rise or view premium, ask which provision it is relying on.
Effective 5 June 2026, the Registration and Stamps Department unit rate for Kokapet is ₹27,000 per square yard of land and ₹2,700 per sq ft of apartment structure on the residential row. Commercial corridors in the same village are set at ₹47,600 and ₹6,600.
Those numbers sit far below any plausible contract price at this address, which has one practical consequence: your duty will be computed on the contract price, not on the government value. The government value here is a floor that this transaction will never touch. Which specific Kokapet locality row applies to Plot No. 1 could not be established, but it changes only that floor, not the duty you actually pay.
| Approval | Reference | Date | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Environmental Clearance | Category B1, Schedule 8(b) | Granted 11 February 2025 | Signed order, verified |
| Standard Terms of Reference | — | Granted 3 June 2024 | Verified |
| AAI height clearance | Number not recited in the clearance | 5 October 2023, and five further NOCs dated 26 October 2023 | Recited in the signed clearance |
| Structural stability certificate | Number not recited | 27 May 2024 | Recited in the signed clearance |
| TG-RERA registration | P02400009393 | Not established | Developer-published, registry-unconfirmed |
| HMDA building permission | 011159/BP/HMDA/2925/SKP/2024 | Not established | Developer-published, not independently verified |
| HMWS&SB water sanction, TGSPDCL power adequacy, fire NOC, TGPCB consent | — | — | Not established. The clearance still requires the water and power permissions as conditions 1.6 and 1.7 |
On RERA, read this before you read anything else. MSN Realty publishes TG RERA NO : P02400009393 in the footer of every page of its own website. We could not confirm that entry in the registry: the Telangana RERA project search is CAPTCHA-gated, and the captcha-free public GIS feed is partial and returns no MSN rows, so its silence proves nothing either way. The number does sit correctly in sequence — the same feed places Prithvi Towers one integer below at P02400009392, with Godrej Madison Avenue at P02400009227 and Rajapushpa Skyra at P02400009520 bracketing it in the same Kokapet registration window — which is consistent with a genuine registration and inconsistent with a fabricated one. That is corroborative, not confirmation. Treat it as a developer-published claim, and confirm it yourself on the official TG-RERA portal before any booking payment. This site does not describe One by MSN as RERA approved, and it does not carry the number P02400004321 that one broker page publishes for this project, which is wrong.
What is verified is the environmental clearance: a signed order of the state environmental authority, appraised on 12 September and 12 December 2024, approved on 9 January 2025 and issued on 11 February 2025.
This page carries no testimonials, no star rating, no aggregate score and no buyer quotations, because none exists that could be sourced. One by MSN is under construction on Plot No. 1 of the Neopolis layout at Kokapet. Nobody lives here, nothing has been handed over, and the developer's own website publishes no possession date at all. Any page showing you a rating out of five for this project, or a resident's opinion of it, has invented both.
What can be assessed is the evidence. There is a surprising amount of it, and it points in two directions at once. This page sets out what the registries actually show, what is verified about the project itself, and the five things a buyer at this price should weigh before paying anything. It is written the same way as the rest of this site: what a filing says, what the developer claims, what an independent source corroborates, and what is simply not established.
| Check | Finding |
|---|---|
| Adverse orders at TG-RERA | None. TG-RERA's Orders, Orders of Authority, Proceedings, Public Notices, Revoked Projects and Agents, and Defaulters lists return zero occurrences of "MSN", read on 31 August 2026 |
| Consumer forum or civil matters | None found involving MSN Urban Ventures LLP or MSN Realty |
| Delivery delays on record | None |
| Completed real-estate projects | None. One by MSN is the MSN Group's first |
| Environmental Clearance | Verified. Signed order of the state environmental authority, granted 11 February 2025, Category B1, Schedule 8(b) |
| TG-RERA registration | P02400009393, published by the developer in its own website footer. Registry entry not confirmed |
| HMDA building permission | 011159/BP/HMDA/2925/SKP/2024, published by the developer. Not independently verified |
| Water, power, fire and pollution-board consents | Not established. The clearance still carries the water and power permissions as conditions to be obtained |
| Joint venture or development-management partner | None. No JV entity appears on any filing, and the group's own August 2024 announcement said it would develop without one |
| Awards, IGBC, LEED or GRIHA certification | None evidenced |
| Aggregate rating | None. There is nothing real to aggregate |
Read that table twice, because both halves matter. The clean regulatory sheet is genuine, and it is clean partly because it is empty. A developer with no completed project cannot have a delivery delay, cannot have a handover dispute, and cannot have a resident association filing against it. Publishing the absence of complaints without publishing the absence of a track record is the single most common distortion on the pages marketing this project, and it is the specific thing this page exists to correct.
MSN Realty publishes TG RERA NO : P02400009393 in the footer of every page of its own website. We could not confirm that entry in the registry. The Telangana RERA project search is CAPTCHA-gated, and the captcha-free public GIS project feed is partial and returns no MSN rows, so its silence proves nothing either way.
The number does sit correctly in sequence. The same public feed places Prithvi Towers one integer below at P02400009392, with Godrej Madison Avenue at P02400009227 and Rajapushpa Skyra at P02400009520 bracketing it in the same Kokapet registration window. That is consistent with a genuine registration and inconsistent with a fabricated one. It is corroborative, not confirmation.
This site therefore does not describe One by MSN as RERA approved, and it does not carry the number P02400004321 that one page marketing this project publishes, which is wrong. Confirm the registration yourself on the official TG-RERA portal before any booking payment. It takes a few minutes and it settles the single most important question on this page.
MSN Realty publishes no price for One by MSN. Not in the 48-page sales deck, not on its own project page, not in the launch press, not in any filing. Every rate in circulation comes from a property portal or a broker listing, and those figures disagree with one another by more than 75 per cent, which is itself the finding: none of them is a price list.
Nor is the developer's charge schedule published. No clubhouse charge, corpus, advance maintenance, car-parking, floor-rise, facing or view premium has been disclosed for this project by anyone. On a home of this size those lines are not a rounding error. Until somebody hands you a written cost sheet against a specific unit number, no number you have seen for this project is a price.
The environmental clearance carries no completion date. The developer publishes none. The RERA-filed completion date is behind the same CAPTCHA as the registration.
The April 2025 launch release indicated December 2029. Property portals circulate February 2030 dates that disagree with each other by 27 days, which is the tell that they are estimates rather than filings. Only a RERA-filed completion date carries a legal remedy for delay, so it is the one to ask for in writing, and the one to check on the portal.
Construction status is similarly thin. The only on-ground report we could source is a single local outlet on 28 April 2026, which described excavation complete for all five basements, several towers at second-floor level with a third in progress, and Shapoorji Pallonji as the contractor. That is one outlet, once. This site publishes no completion percentage and no "on schedule" claim, because there is no evidence base for either.
At 660 homes on 7.717 acres the density is about 85.5 homes per acre on our own arithmetic. That is higher than Brigade Gateway at Neopolis at about 61 per acre, APR Olympia at about 63 and My Home 99 at about 57. Anyone can do that division, and a claim of exclusivity on a per-acre basis does not survive it.
What is genuinely distinctive is uniformity, not sparseness. One by MSN is 4 BHK only, in two variants, and the smallest residence anywhere on the plot is 5,250 sq ft saleable. No other single-configuration project in Kokapet attempts it at this scale. If what you are buying is a small number of neighbours, this is the wrong building and the density figure is the first thing to check. If what you are buying is a building where no home is materially smaller than yours, it is close to the only one.
Roughly fifteen live broker properties market One by MSN or MSN Realty, and several publish specifications that appear in no filing and in no developer document: 700 units, three-bedroom homes, 4.5 BHK, 2,500 to 4,000 sq ft, a ₹3.5 crore ticket, six towers, 7.75 acres, and a RERA number belonging to nothing. One asserts that RERA registration is "underway", when in fact a number is published and simply unconfirmed.
None of that is true. One by MSN is 4 BHK only. There is no 3 BHK and no 2,500 sq ft home. The smallest residence is 5,250 sq ft, the towers number five, and the site is 7.717 acres as filed. The practical consequence for a buyer is that arriving at a site visit with numbers taken from a search result is a good way to be quoted against a specification that does not exist. Take the filed figures with you.
One by MSN is marketed under the MSN Realty brand, which is the real-estate division of the Hyderabad-based MSN Group. The entity that signs the filings, holds the approvals and is the promoter of record is MSN Urban Ventures LLP. Those two names are not interchangeable, and a buyer should know which one appears on the agreement.
This page sets out what the registries, the environmental filings and the developer's own dated documents show about that company, and keeps them apart from what its marketing claims. It also states, in the same breath, the two facts about this developer that belong together and are almost never published together: the group behind it has a pharmaceutical balance sheet of genuine scale, and its real-estate arm has never completed a project.
The project itself is also listed by portals and brokers as MSN One, MSN One Neopolis and One by MSN Kokapet. The developer's own branding uses the form ONE by MSN, and its own website never uses the inverted version.
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Which brand is on the hoarding? | MSN Realty, described on its own about page as the real-estate division of MSN Group, established 2021 |
| Which entity signs the filings and is the promoter of record? | MSN Urban Ventures LLP, the applicant on both the Standard Terms of Reference and the Environmental Clearance for this project |
| When was that entity incorporated? | 16 September 2021, Registrar of Companies, Hyderabad, in the business of construction |
| Is there a joint venture or a landowner share? | None on any filing. The group's own August 2024 announcement said it would develop without joint ventures, and no JV entity appears in any document we could reach |
| Does the LLP own the land? | Not established. Whether Plot No. 1 was conveyed to MSN Urban Ventures LLP, or is being developed under an agreement with the group company that bid at the 2021 auction, could not be determined from any public record. The LLP is the promoter and developer of record, and that is the accurate form |
No entity named "MSN Realty Private Limited" or "MSN Realty LLP" exists in any company registry. The developer's own contact page resolves the ambiguity itself: it prints the address block for MSN Urban Ventures LLP directly above the heading for the MSN Realty corporate office, at the same address, and the LLP's own published email address runs on the MSN Realty domain.
So the useful way to hold it is this. The buyer recognises MSN Realty and One by MSN. The name on the environmental clearance, and on any registration certificate you are shown, is MSN Urban Ventures LLP. If a document you are handed carries a third name, ask why.
| Office | Address |
|---|---|
| Registered office of the LLP | Plot No. 591, Road No. 31, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad 500033, as recorded in the addressee block of a signed order of the state environmental authority dated 15 May 2026 |
| Corporate office | MSN Corporate, H. No. 2-91/10 and 11/MSN, Ground Floor, Whitefields, Kondapur, Hyderabad 500084, as recorded in the signed Environmental Clearance of 11 February 2025 and on the developer's own contact page |
The credibility behind MSN Realty is not a construction record. It is a balance sheet, and it is worth setting out precisely because it is the strongest thing on this page.
MSN Laboratories was established on 27 August 2003 by Dr. Manne Satyanarayana Reddy, known as Dr. MSN Reddy, with ₹5 crore of initial capital. That figure is published on the company's own leadership page. He is the group's founder, chairman and managing director, and he is named as such in the developer's own sales deck and about page, which is why this site names him. He holds an M.Sc in Organic Chemistry from Osmania University in 1983, a PhD in 1988 and post-doctoral research in organic chemistry in 1990, and worked from 1990 through group leader to head of research and development at a leading Indian pharmaceutical company before founding MSN. His company's page credits him with 170 patent publications globally, 73 of them granted, and 53 research publications, and he carries a Forbes India billionaire profile.
The group today operates through MSN Laboratories, MSN Lifesciences and MSN Pharmachem, runs 15 active pharmaceutical ingredient facilities and 6 finished-dosage facilities across India and the United States, and crossed US$1 billion in revenue in FY2023-24.
What that means to a homebuyer, stated honestly: a pharmaceutical balance sheet is evidence of funding capacity, not of construction capability. They are different questions and this page will not blur them. What it does mean concretely is that the group has committed very large sums to land in this city at government auction, in cash, without a partner, and that funding risk on this project is low by the standard of the sector. Execution risk is a separate matter, and there is no completed building against which to measure it.
MSN Realty is a well-funded first-time developer with a clean sheet and no record. The capital is real, the land was bought openly at government auction, the environmental clearance for this project is a signed government order that we have read, and there is nothing adverse on any Telangana registry against the name.
Set against that: nothing has been delivered, no possession date is on record, no price is published, and the registration number the developer publishes could not be confirmed in the registry. A buyer is being asked to fund an eight-figure purchase from a builder whose construction competence has to be inferred from a contractor engagement reported once, and from a pharmaceutical balance sheet that says nothing about how a tower gets built.
Neither of those paragraphs cancels the other. Both should be on the table when the cost sheet arrives.
Frequently Asked Questions
MSN Realty publishes TG-RERA number P02400009393 in the footer of every page of its own website, and that is a genuine developer claim. We could not confirm the entry in the registry itself, because the Telangana RERA project search is protected by a CAPTCHA and the captcha-free public GIS project feed is partial and returns no MSN rows, so its silence proves nothing either way. The number does sit correctly in sequence against neighbouring Kokapet registrations, which supports its authenticity without establishing it. Treat it as a developer-published claim and verify it yourself on the official TG-RERA portal before you pay any booking amount.
No. That number is wrong, and it is published by a broker page marketing this project. The only registration number MSN Realty itself publishes for One by MSN is P02400009393. A separate claim in circulation, that RERA registration for this project is "underway", is also wrong in the other direction: a number is published, it is simply unconfirmed in the registry. If you are shown a registration number by anyone other than the developer, check it on the official portal before you rely on it.
660. That is the number filed in the signed environmental clearance granted on 11 February 2025. The developer's own sales deck and website market 655 residences, and every property portal and broker page repeats the 655. We publish the filed figure and disclose the marketed one beside it. As to why they differ, we do not know and we are not going to invent a reason: the five-home difference is not explained in any source we could find. What we can say is which document each number comes from. The 655 is the developer's marketing figure, printed on the deck cover and driving the counter on its own website; the 660 is the figure in the promoter's own filing, carried into an order signed by the state environmental authority. Where marketing and a filing disagree, this site publishes the filing, discloses the marketing figure, and averages neither.
The environmental clearance files the five residential towers individually. Three of them are filed at 57 upper floors with a helipad and two at 56 upper floors with a helipad, each over four to five basement levels and a ground floor, with three of the five also carrying a service floor. The separate clubhouse block is filed at five basements, ground and four upper floors. "Up to 57 upper floors" is the accurate short phrasing. The clearance also files 2,904 four-wheeler and 250 two-wheeler parking bays across a parking area of 1,27,531.33 sq m, which the order states as 33.47 per cent - a share of the built-up area net of the parking itself, not of the 31,229.59 sq m site.
Five residential towers, plus a separate clubhouse block. The developer names the towers AON, UNO, EKA, ODIN and ISA. The environmental clearance and the deck agree on the count of five, and five separate Airports Authority height NOCs were issued in October 2023, which is consistent with it. Pages advertising six towers for this project are wrong.
No. One by MSN is 4 BHK only, in two variants: 4 BHK + M, and 4 BHK + M + HO. There is no 3 BHK, no 3.5 BHK, no 4.5 BHK and no compact tier hidden in the lower floors. The smallest residence anywhere on the 7.717 acres is 5,250 sq ft saleable. Some pages advertise a three-bedroom home of around 2,500 sq ft at about ₹3.5 crore under names such as "MSN Neopolis". That programme appears in no filing and matches none of the MSN entities' Neopolis parcels. If you have been quoted a 3 BHK here, you have been quoted a building that does not exist.
There are four distinct saleable sizes, and the developer's own area statement breaks each one into carpet, balcony and common area, which most developers do not publish until asked. Towers AON and UNO are 7,460 sq ft saleable, with carpet of 4,201 sq ft east facing and 4,204 sq ft west, balconies of 909 and 893 sq ft and common area of 2,350 and 2,363 sq ft. Towers EKA and ODIN are 5,250 sq ft east and west facing, on carpet of 3,074 and 3,064 sq ft, and 5,510 sq ft north facing, on carpet of 3,188 sq ft. Tower ISA is 6,465 sq ft, on carpet of 3,734 sq ft east and 3,714 sq ft west. The published range is therefore 5,250 to 7,460 sq ft, with four sizes inside it rather than two. Carpet area is what RERA sells on, so it is the number to check on any agreement.
One. The environmental clearance files a single clubhouse block of five basements, ground and four upper floors, and the deck describes one yacht-shaped clubhouse. Separately, each of the five towers carries its own amenity suite, and there is a Sky Park at the top of the scheme; the developer puts the combined total at 1,80,000 sq ft of clubhouse, Sky Park and amenities. A developer blog post of July 2026 describes seven grand clubhouses. That is relabelling the tower amenity floors, and this site does not carry the number seven. Note too that the developer's website separately mentions over 70,000 sq ft of stilt amenities, which is a subset of the 1,80,000 sq ft and must not be added to it.
No, and it is worth being straight about it. At 660 homes on 7.717 acres the density is about 85.5 homes per acre on our own arithmetic, which is higher than Brigade Gateway at Neopolis at about 61 per acre, APR Olympia at about 63 and My Home 99 at about 57. Any page selling you exclusivity on a per-acre basis here is making a claim that a single division defeats. What genuinely distinguishes One by MSN is uniformity rather than sparseness: it is 4 BHK only, with nothing smaller anywhere on the plot, at a scale no other single-configuration project in Kokapet attempts.
MSN Realty publishes no price for One by MSN. Not in the 48-page sales deck, not on its own project page, not in the launch press, and not in any filing. All four were inspected directly on 31 August 2026. Every rate and ticket figure in circulation comes from a property portal or a broker page, and those figures disagree with one another by more than 75 per cent, which is itself the finding: none of them is a price list. Independent market evidence for new-launch Neopolis inventory in 2026, including Godrej Properties' own guidance on the neighbouring Plot 16 and Brigade Enterprises' disclosed sales realisation, points to an effective rate of roughly ₹13,300 to ₹16,100 per sq ft, which would place a 5,250 to 7,460 sq ft residence in a band of roughly ₹7 crore to ₹12 crore before statutory charges. That is a market estimate, not MSN Realty's rate, and it should be used for planning rather than negotiation.
Not established, and this site publishes no possession date as fact. The environmental clearance carries no completion date, the developer publishes none on its own project page, and the RERA-filed completion date is behind the same CAPTCHA as the registration. The April 2025 launch release indicated December 2029, which may be quoted as what the developer said at launch. Property portals circulate February 2030 dates that disagree with each other by 27 days, which is the tell that they are estimates rather than filings. Only a RERA-filed completion date carries a legal remedy for delay, so it is the one to ask for in writing and to read for yourself on the portal.
Plot No. 1, Survey Numbers 239 and 240, Neopolis Layout, Kokapet revenue village, Gandipet Mandal, Rangareddy District, Telangana 500075, at 17.404925 north, 78.304675 east. That is the address and the coordinate printed on the signed environmental clearance. OpenStreetMap carries a surveyed construction footprint named "MSN Realty" whose centroid sits 139 m from that filed coordinate, which is about as close to independent on-ground confirmation as a plot boundary gets. The site area as filed is 31,229.59 sq m, being 7.717 acres, and the developer markets it as 7.7 acres.
Every figure here is a road distance, routed on OpenStreetMap data with two independent engines and calibrated against the TomTom Traffic Index 2025 for Hyderabad. The nearest Outer Ring Road carriageway is 839 m north of the plot as a proximity, and the access point is the Neopolis trumpet interchange at about 1.3 to 1.6 km, roughly 3 to 5 minutes. The Financial District core routes at 5.55 km, about 13 minutes at typical congestion, Wipro Circle at 6.63 km and about 14 minutes, the Gachibowli junction at 8.27 km and about 18 minutes, and HITEC City at 15.57 km and about 26 minutes. Rajiv Gandhi International Airport is 32.43 km, of which 23.5 km runs on the ORR, and the honest travel time is 35 to 45 minutes. Always ask which anchor a quoted "Gachibowli" distance uses, because it is 6.6 km, 8.3 km or 12.8 km depending on the point chosen.
Not yet, and not soon. Hyderabad Metro Phase 2 Corridor V runs Raidurg to Kokapet Neopolis over 11.6 km with 8 stations, and its named terminus is inside this layout; HMRL's own general-consultant tender of 12 August 2026 says so in those terms. What the corridor does not have is the part that matters. It has the Centre's in-principle approval for 50:50 funding and no full financial sanction, no civil-works award, no construction and no published station siting. With 8 stations over 11.6 km, the terminus could sit anywhere across the layout. The nearest operating station today is Raidurg, 13.41 km and about 21 minutes away by road. Any page quoting two minutes to a Neopolis metro station is quoting a station that has not been sited.
One by MSN is developed by MSN Urban Ventures LLP, incorporated on 16 September 2021, trading as MSN Realty, the real-estate division of the MSN Group. The group's pharmaceutical arm, MSN Laboratories, was founded in 2003 by Dr. MSN Reddy and crossed US$1 billion in revenue in FY2023-24. One by MSN is the group's first real-estate project, and its own sales deck says so. That means no completed projects and no delivered square feet, and equally no RERA complaints, no adverse orders, no public notices and no delivery delays: TG-RERA's orders, proceedings, public notices, revoked and defaulters lists return zero occurrences of "MSN". Both halves of that record belong together, and a page that publishes only the clean sheet is telling you half the story. The main contractor is reported as the Shapoorji Pallonji Group by a single local outlet on 28 April 2026, which is a report rather than a filing fact, and worth confirming with the developer.